Відео

@@kkadw of course!

@@fromjesse how?

@@kkadw The same way you learned in high school math class. It hasn't changed in hundreds of years! The geometry of perspective is well known.

@@fromjesse You want to tell me that you can measure and calculate the curvature on a distance of 36.4mi based on sight?

What model is your Theodolite and what is the maximum distance according to the spec?

Hey is that you Lefty? I think your handle changed! good to hear from you! I been pretty busy with work + family + projects!

Well, the mower's a couple decades old I'm sure. I think eventually the bolts just jiggled loose LOL

However it measures as rotating, so why should just throw out my own objective measurements because of the opinion of somebody who's never measured?

@@fromjesse and doctors say the covid vaccine does wonders, we should prolly listen to them too cuz they have white lab coats

@@sectokia1909 calm down, this video is satire.

How do you know that planes aren't affected even a tiny bit by earth's spin? Do you not know that earth only spins at 15 degrees per HOUR? Do you not know that an airplane can turn, bank, pitch, roll, and yaw at THOUSANDS of degrees per hour? Do you not know that the Coriolis effect on a flying airplane would feel to the pilot like an extremely small crosswind? Do you not know that the pilot would perceive the Coriolis effect as an extremely small crosswind, and would correct for it just the same as he would a cross wind and wouldn't even know the difference? Do you even know how airplanes fly?

@@fromjesse Have you seen that animation of how the coriolis effect should affect the planes at north pole? Planes would be incapable of flying at the poles. In reality, planes at the poles dont suffer from this extreme effect

@@AndyBrownlie Why did you not answer a single one of my questions? Are you afraid of the answers? > _Have you seen that animation of how the coriolis effect should affect the planes at north pole?_ How many times have you flamed a glober for trying to use CGI to prove a point? And now you're doing it. That animation is just CGI and doesn't represent reality, because it's not playing at the right speed. They have the earth rotation sped way way up but not the plane's velocity. That's just downright dishonest. Try your CGI again but be honest and stop straw manning the globe claims. Put both the plane at it's correct velocity, AND the globe at it's correct 15 degrees per hour. You will then find that it's totally not an extreme effect. Please stop making straw man arguments here. You are using a fallacy and it's not honest. If you actually do the globe math or do your CGI simulation at the CORRECT speeds, you would find that the effect would be so slight that the pilot would correct for it without even knowing, just thinking it was a very slight cross breeze if he even noticed. Please answer this question before you say anything else: Are aware that airplane pilots are trained and do practice correcting for crosswinds in order to keep on their planned path? Yes or no. Are you aware of that?

@@fromjesse Yes. But do these crosswinds match a sphere rotating at 15 degrees/h?

​@@fromjesse" airplane pilots are trained and do practice correcting for crosswinds in order to keep on their planned path" You just said it, if the earth was round, it should be the winds that make the plane follow a straight path on the sphere. atmosphere rotates with the earth, remember? But on our flat earth the planes *correct* for crosswinds.

The down is very fluffy. It expands to fill the space. Almost like gas in a container. See this video to better understand: ua-cam.com/video/UTTLDl_Y98U/v-deo.html This keeps it distributed throughout the chamber, if you have enough that it fills the whole space and still retains a little bit of "pressure."

They noticed when the last one dropped out. They had got it to the front yard a few weeks before calling me. When I showed up, I said "Take me to the spot where it quit." They did. The grass was of course grown a bit, but I used a metal detector to find one of the missing bolts. From there I went to hardware store and matched it up and got 4 new Grade 8 bolts and stainless split washers and put it all back together. It out lasted the deck after that! Eventually the deck gave out so I swapped customer with a similar vintage craftsman mower with a good deck. Couple years later I refurbished another desk and put it on this mower and sold it to a friend who's still using it. (The blade clutch did self destruct so I put a new one of those on for him!) I never did find the other 3 bolts, but who knows where they fell out, since they fell out one at a time. It didn't quit till the last one fell out, and that's the one I found :D

Globe confirmed 💯 🌎

...but not far enough for me to see America from the UK. Go figure

Indeed, I'd have thought the same. Thorough stirring is much more difficult than it seems, despite the low viscosity.

@@theplanetruth thank you for your kind comment! Could you please clarify? Are you saying that refraction is causing flat earth to appear just like it would if it was a globe?

“i cAN SeE tOo fAR” 😂😂

Flurfs don’t admit that refraction exists.

Yet always bottom first.

@@dogwalker666 Refraction will do that

@@pablosdog2808 ?

​@@pablosdog2808 You know you can check the direction of refraction by using light of two different wavelengths?

Actually, it's well known that helium tank pressurized to 2000 PSI is heavier, so that's been done! (And due to the Obviously my vacuum chamber can't hold pressure because it is the outside air pressure that holds the lid on! However, it would be interesting to pump a vacuum, show the reduced weight, and then let back in helium instead of air, and show that helium actually does have more weight than vacuum. Helium is kind of expensive unless you get a helium balloon kit for like $33USD which is still kind of a lot for one experiment.

Thanks :D I kind of skipped around in his new video, I see he's going on about ohms law. The other day I checked the voltage on my car's battery. It was 12.3 volts. Assuming an internal resistance of 0.01 ohms, we can use ohms law to calculate that the battery was delivering 1230 amps to my volt meter. Which is funny because my volt meter has a 10megohm/volt input impedance, so I would like to know how many volts it takes to push 1230 amps through my volt meter! (Read parody here.)

hehe one of the Aetherboys was telling me that vacuum didn't have buoyancy like hydrogen does.

Indeed!

And that mass has weight. So there is no need for a flat earth, or a sealed container.

Exactly! I was basically measuring the column weight of the air within the pot!

@@fromjesse Columns can't be conceptual bro 🤪

Didn't need one :D

Perhaps if I use 60 NM per degree at the Equator: radius = 60 NM x 360 / (2 x Pi) = 3438 NM. Radius at latitude 48.1 = 3438 NM x (90 - 48.1) / 90 = 1600.58 NM. 1 arc minute around the line of latitude is 1600.58 NM x 2 x Pi / (360 x 60) = 0.4656 NM or 862 meters. Nope still way out.

Indeed! It sure matches a globe closer than it does a flat surface, doesn't it!

@@JesseKozlowski That's not why you'd measure a difference, even on a perfect sphere one minute of longitude will be shorter than one minute of latitude everywhere except on the equator

@@giovanirubim2758 , oh duh but of course!!! Duh. You are absolutely correct. I would have appeared to be more on the ball if I said something smarter such as, naturally the distances between lines of Longitude will be shorter than between lines of latitude, but, you should also be able to detect that the shape is not a perfect circular ball, rather a slightly squashed at the poles ellipsoid shape. There, how's that? Thanks for correcting me :-)

Check the description! It's already been done in Australia at around 34 degrees South! And we got a guy working to do it also at 26 degrees South as well!

Yes, the physical surface distance between lines of longitude is greatest at the equator, and less the farther you get from the equator -- converging both going southward and going northward of the equator.

Yes that’s how spheres work!

I agree, the total station Electronic Distance Measurement is most likely the most accurate of the methods I used. The GPS is just a consumer grade GPS and is likely to have a meter of error and finding exact sub-meter accurate spots on google earth is tricky. And yeah the trundle wheel bounces along and isn't perfectly exact. But it's also strictly physical, so that's why it's important for those people who don't understand how a laser range finder works. I'm not sure what you mean when you mention seeing a radius animated. Do you understand that lines of longitude are fixed physical locations on earth? And that we can measure the distance between them using purely physical methods?

@@fromjesselongitude is a concept, dude. All you have is a physical area upon which to overlay this concept. It’s not reality. Your E/W longitude am bs isn’t reality; it’s just a concept.

@@theplanetruth Would you be willing to discuss this with me on your show or on Jeran's show if he's willing?

Do you believe that lines of longitude are straight? Do you believe that lines of longitude are evenly spaced? Please answer yes or no to each, then I can answer the rest of your question.

The fact that meridians converge at two poles both North and South of the equator means that you can travel South or North along any meridian and, without turning left or right, end up on the opposite meridian, and you'll eventually end up all the way back to where your started.

Oh right, why should measurements of the size of the Earth have anything to do with the shape and size of the Earth... 😂

​​@@fromjesse depends what you use to read the longitude: a flat map viewed from above the North Pole 🗺️ or a curved Globe 🌍. That's exactly what I was pointing out, but you seem not to get it.

​@@fromjesse longitude and latitude is just reference points to the celestial body. Meridian is set to 0° based to Greenwich, England - while Equator is probably set to Polaris 0° at horizon.

Thanks! After hearing my speech, what would you say is the one thing I should work on to be more clear and easier to listen to? Slow down? Enunciate more clearly? More/less inflection? Etc? Thanks!

@@fromjesse I think you speak really well, you're very easy to understand, clear, precise, nice pace. All I think about this video, for future ones, is maybe give a quick easy-to-follow explanation for some things that are taken as granted knowldege, eg what a minute of longitude is for laypeople.

@@HarryKey Good idea! Thanks!

Thank you thank you and thank you! And thank you for your excellent measurement and video in Australia! ua-cam.com/video/-g-437wi9Ds/v-deo.html

If I can get hold of a trundler, I'll trundle at 38°13'44.67"S, 144° 6'33.35"E.

@@billybowden7079 Woah that is a great E-W line, but it looks like a railroad track -- is there a smooth surface to roll the trundle on? Or would you have to modify the wheel to go on a train track? Also, watch out for trains!

@@fromjesse Ha! I didn't check the terrain, just saw the line on Google Maps. If that's the train tracks to Warrnambool, I don't think I want to mess with the freight trains on that line! I'll scope it out this week.

As I said, in the video, a flat earther had told me that if I took any boat on any ball and sailed it over the curve, it would vanish mast first. So I tested his claim. What's wrong with that?

@@MaxWithoutPain i wouldn't call it massive. 5 mile horizon is about what we expect for a 15.5ft observer height, no?at least roughly ?

@@fromjesse 5 miles to that horizon sure, what about the drop ⤵️ over the horizon? Why does it dip so much for that short of a distance? Why do object that dip "over" the horizon remain leveled with the eye level or the horizontal line?

@@MaxWithoutPain I'm not sure what you're talking about. The dip looks to me like just about what we'd expect on a globe earth. You can go on google maps and find the distance to the land beyond the island. Its not super close to the observer.

@@fromjesse I'm trying to figure out what the horizon is, as in a visual artistic perspective. I have doubts that it is because of a curve. If objects curved they wouldn't stay to the original level, because according to "gravity" objects that go over a curve supposed to level with the curve - they don't.

@@MaxWithoutPain The horizon is defined as the limiting circle of the surface beyond which you cannot see the surface. Technically it is the intersection of the path of light and the surface of the water. A horizon REQUIRES that at least either the light or the surface be non flat or not straight, because it requires that one of them intersects the other at a point and then diverge again. It could be curving light on a flat surface, straight light and a curving surface, or a combination of a curving surface and curving light that intersect at a point. Two straight parallel lines cannot touch at just one point in the middle. One of them must curve. Laws of geometry says that. Flat earth has no explanation for horizons.

@@rajbhai-tp7cf its an artificial solar eclipse made with a flashlight and a small plastic jar

​@@fromjesse The video title says lunar eclipse

@@rajbhai-tp7cf HA! Thanks! Fixed it. You're right.